Demographic Variations in Acoustic Sensitivity: Implications for Auditorium Design in Nigerian Higher Education
“crossref”/

Main Article Content

Roberts A. 
Ibitoye O. A. 
Olaoye G. O. 

Abstract

Acoustic comfort is increasingly recognised as a critical factor in the performance and well-being of users within educational environments. However, limited attention has been paid to how demographic variables influence users’ perception of acoustic quality in university auditoria, particularly within the Nigerian context. This study investigates how age, gender, and user role shape subjective experiences of acoustic comfort, with the goal of informing more inclusive and responsive architectural design. A structured questionnaire was administered to 365 respondents comprising students, lecturers, and institutional guests in a private Nigerian university. Using a quantitative descriptive design, data were analysed through descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations to identify perceptual patterns across demographic groups. Findings revealed significant variations in acoustic sensitivity. Female respondents and individuals aged 21–30 years reported higher levels of discomfort, particularly with echo, reverberation, and speech clarity. Students, who constitute the most frequent users of auditoria, expressed the greatest dissatisfaction and were most vocal in advocating for improved acoustic environments. These trends underscore the importance of integrating user perceptions into design and evaluation processes. Drawing from psychoacoustic theory and the salutogenic design framework, the study proposes a suite of responsive strategies including psychoacoustic zoning, adaptive ceiling treatments, modular sound systems, and post-occupancy evaluation mechanisms. The study contributes a novel perspective to African-based architectural acoustics literature by emphasizing the psycho-social dimensions of auditory comfort. It argues that the traditional one-size-fits-all approach to auditorium design often neglects perceptual diversity and may inadvertently reinforce discomfort among certain demographic groups. The research offers a replicable methodology for assessing and integrating demographic sensitivity into design decisions and concludes with practical recommendations for architects, planners, and policy-makers in higher education. Ultimately, the study promotes equity-focused, user-centred spatial planning as a necessary step towards sustainable and inclusive learning environments in Nigerian universities.

Article Details

Adedokun, R., Ibitoye, O. A., & Olaoye, G. O. (2025). Demographic Variations in Acoustic Sensitivity: Implications for Auditorium Design in Nigerian Higher Education. African Journal of Environmental Sciences and Renewable Energy, 20(1), 01-21. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajesre.2025.020.01011
Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Roberts A., Ibitoye O. A., Olaoye G. O. (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Roberts A., Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria.

Department of Architecture,

College of Environmental Science and Management.

Ibitoye O. A., Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria.

Department of Architecture,

College of Environmental Science and Management.

Olaoye G. O., Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria.

Department of Architecture,

College of Environmental Science and Management.

Acoustic Comfort Special Issue. (2024). Special Issue: Acoustic quality in educational buildings. Acoustics, MDPI.

Barros, M. C., Corcoran, K., & Schranz, T. (2023). Introducing the comfort performance gap in new educational buildings: A case study. arXiv.

Feltouch. (2024). The importance of acoustic comfort in educational environments. Feltouch.

Grassi, M., Felline, A., Orlandi, N., Toffanin, M., Goli, G. P., Senyuva, H. A., & Contemori, G. (2024). psychoacoustics-web: A free online tool for the estimation of auditory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 7465–7481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02430-3

Kuri, A. B., & Pérez, S. J. (2022). Acoustic study and architectural proposals to improve acoustic comfort in a university campus of Mexico City. Applied Acoustics, 185, 108416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108416

Montiel, I., Mayoral, A. M., Navarro Pedreño, J., & Maiques, S. (2023). Acoustic comfort in learning spaces: Moving towards sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 15(2).

Onyema, R. J. (2023). Quantitative strategies for environmental assessment in Nigerian universities. Journal of Environmental Design, 8(3), 55–63.

Presentation Spaces Team. (2024). Acoustic excellence: Transforming learning and work spaces. Presentation Spaces Blog.

Sentürk, H., & Akdağ, N. (2023). Optimization of room acoustics parameter values depending on auditory sensitivity distinctions. Megaron, 18(2), 172–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2023.23080

Spoor, L., van den Berg, T., & Steffens, J. (2024). A framework for developing adaptive acoustic comfort: Insights from expert interviews. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 90.

Taşdemir, E., & Karcı, Z. S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of research on acoustic comfort in educational interiors. Current Issues in Interiors Symposium.

Tong, X., et al. (2022). The effect of the acoustic environment of learning spaces on student outcomes: A review. Educational Acoustics Journal.

von Berg, M., Himmelein, H., & Steffens, J. (2024). Effects of noise sensitivity and listening effort on perceptual ratings of background noise. Journal of Auditory Perception, 58(8), 345–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0028201

Woods, K. J. P., McDermott, J. H., & Whiteford, K. L. (2022). Web-based psychoacoustics: Hearing screening, infrastructure, and large-N studies. Behavior Research Methods, 54(5), 2340–2352.

Yang, Y.-N., Zhou, J., Song, J.-R., Wang, X.-P., Xu, X.-H., Li, Y.-X., Zeng, J.-C., Sa, Y., & Jiang, W. (2024). Architectural physical acoustic environmental design transformation of academic lecture halls in the universities an example from Yunnan University. Buildings, 14(6), 1583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061583