AI-Driven Software Supply Chain Security and Risk Assessment A Hybrid Graph Neural Network, Transformer, and Sequence-Learning Framework
“crossref”/

Main Article Content

Samuel Okechukwu Nnaji 
Christian Basil Omeh 
Christabel Linda Uchenwa 

Abstract

The growing complexity of software ecosystems has made the Software Supply Chain (SSC) a primary target for cyberattacks, as evidenced by SolarWinds, Log4Shell, and the XZ Utils backdoor. Traditional Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and static scanning tools are reactive and poorly suited to detecting novel or provenance-based threats in dependencies, build pipelines, and package registries. This study proposes and evaluates an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven framework for software supply chain security and risk assessment that integrates a Graph Neural Network (GNN) for dependency-graph risk propagation, a Transformer encoder for source-code anomaly detection, and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for modelling temporal drift in build and release pipelines. Outputs from the three learners are combined through an ensemble fusion layer to generate an interpretable risk score for each component. The study adopted a design-science and quantitative approach. The framework was trained and evaluated on a curated dataset comprising 6.4 million GitHub commits, 5,000 registry packages, 38,600 CVE-to-package mappings, 2,313 synthetic Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs), and 312 malicious artefacts. Results show that the hybrid ensemble achieved 96.3% accuracy, 95.6% precision, 94.8% recall, an F1-score of 95.2%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.98, outperforming GNN, LSTM, Random Forest, SVM, and Logistic Regression baselines by 6–18 percentage points across metrics. Combining structural, semantic, and temporal signals improves detection of malicious and high-risk components over single-model approaches, while producing risk scores aligned with NIST SSDF and the EU Cyber Resilience Act. The paper concludes with recommendations for AI-driven risk scoring in DevSecOps and SBOM governance.

Article Details

Nnaji, S. O., Omeh, C. B., & Uchenwa, C. L. (2026). AI-Driven Software Supply Chain Security and Risk Assessment: A Hybrid Graph Neural Network, Transformer, and Sequence-Learning Framework. African Journal of Advances in Science and Technology Research, 23(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajastr.2026.023.01019
Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Okechukwu Nnaji, Christian Basil Omeh, Christabel Linda Uchenwa (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Aljaafreh, R., Al-Doghman, F., Hussain, F., Khan, F., & Aljaafreh, A. (2026). Integrating machine learning and business intelligence into supply chain risk management for a comprehensive cybersecurity framework: A systematic literature review. Technologies, 14(4), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14040194c DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14040194

Düsing, J., & Hermann, B. (2022). Analyzing the direct and transitive impact of vulnerabilities onto different artifact repositories. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 3(4), Article 37, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3472811

Feng, X., Gao, Y., Wu, J., & Shi, L. (2025). Research on security risk identification and evaluation in open-source software supply chain. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Digital Management and Information Technology (DMIT ’25), 257–266. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3736426.3736467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3736426.3736467

Kalouptsoglou, I., Siavvas, M., Ampatzoglou, A., Kehagias, D., & Chatzigeorgiou, A. (2025). Transfer learning for software vulnerability prediction using Transformer models. Journal of Systems and Software, 227, Article 112448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112448

Li, Z., et al. (2018). VulDeePecker: A deep learning-based system for vulnerability detection. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2018.23158

Lin, G., Wen, S., Han, Q.-L., Zhang, J., & Xiang, Y. (2020). Software vulnerability detection using deep neural networks: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(10), 1825–1848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.2993293

Lins, M., Mayrhofer, R., & Roland, M. (2025). Unveiling the critical attack path for implanting backdoors in supply chains: Practical experience from XZ. In Y. Kim, A. Miyaji, & M. Tibouchi (Eds.), Cryptology and Network Security: 24th International Conference, CANS 2025, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 16351, pp. 521–541). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4434-9_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4434-9_24

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2022). Secure software development framework (SSDF) version 1.1: Recommendations for mitigating the risk of software vulnerabilities (NIST Special Publication 800-218).

Rosso, M., Jaffar, M., Brighente, A., & Conti, M. (2024). Impacts of software bill of materials (SBOM) generation on vulnerability detection. In Proceedings of the 2024 Workshop on Software Supply Chain Offensive Research and Ecosystem Defenses (SCORED). ACM.

Sejfia, A., Das, S., Shafiq, S., & Medvidović, N. (2024). Toward improved deep learning-based vulnerability detection. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 62:1–62:12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3608141

Sood, A. K., & Zeadally, S. (2025). Malicious AI models undermine software supply-chain security. Communications of the ACM, 68(6), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3704724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3704724

Steenhoek, B., Gao, H., & Le, W. (2024). Dataflow analysis-inspired deep learning for efficient vulnerability detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3623345

Teichmann, F. (2025). The Cyber Resilience Act as a new paradigm for product security: A compliance roadmap. International Cybersecurity Law Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-025-00162-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-025-00162-4

Vera Buschmann, F., Pauliuchenka, P., Oh, E., Kao, B. C., DiValentin, L., & Bader, D. A. (2025). Graph-based profiling of dependency vulnerability remediation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science of Cyber Security (SciSec 2025). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2417-1_8

Zhou, L., Dacier, M., & Konstantinou, C. (2026). A reality check on SBOM-based vulnerability management: An empirical study and a path forward. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (CODASPY ’26) (pp. 255–268). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3800506.3803490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3800506.3803490

Zhou, Y., Liu, S., Siow, J., Du, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Devign: Effective vulnerability identification by learning comprehensive program semantics via graph neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 32, pp. 10197–10207). Curran Associates.