Assessment of Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion Using Likert-Type Scale

Main Article Content

Yaska Mutah
Nuhu, Bata Malgwi

Abstract

This research aims to analyzing measures of central tendency (mean, median, and mode), and measures of dispersion (variance and standard deviation) and to graphically present the simulated data using Likert scale measurement. Mean (μ), Median (Md), Mode (Mod), Variance ( ), and Standard deviation (σ) have been calculated on simulated data using 5 and 4 points Likert scales with four different statements. Data analysis is key in any development especially when there is need to understanding people's opinions on a particular issue that has attracted the attention of a specific population. Likert scale of measurement is one of the methods that use statement problems in collecting statistical data in which the respondent agrees with the opinion or disagrees.  Considering the 5-point Likert scale, the measure of dispersion in which statement two had the highest standard deviation of 1.53 and the mean value of 2.35 being the least of the mean values implies the significant spread of the data across opinions. Statement one of the 4-points Likert scale has two modes (bimodal) where the opinions “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” have ties of 20 responses each. This implies that interpretation of such data may be difficult, because the data can be roughly split into two different groups, and can be useful for further research to find a mode to draw conclusions. The best form of Likert scale can be recommended for 5-point Likert scale so as to give room for undecided opinion. Other measures of central tendency and dispersion can be useful in interpretation but the recommended statistical tool is standard deviation as it shows the spread of the opinions about the mean.

Keywords: Data, Likert, Analysis, Measurement, Opinion

Article Details

Yaska, M., & Nuhu, B. M. (2024). Assessment of Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion Using Likert-Type Scale. African Journal of Advances in Science and Technology Research, 16(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajastr.2024.016.010379
Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 Yaska Mutah, Nuhu, Bata Malgwi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Yaska Mutah, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics,

Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. 

Nuhu, Bata Malgwi, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics,

Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. 

Adelson, J. L., and McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: The effects of a 4-point or 5-point Likert-type scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 796-807.doi:10.1177/0013164410366694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410366694

Adeniran, A. O. (2019). Application of Likert Scale's Type and Cronbach's Alpha Analysis in an Airport Perception Study. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 2(4), 01-05

Alkharusi, H. (2022). A Descriptive Analysis and Interpretation of Data from Likert Scales in Educational and Psychological Research, Indian Journal of Psychology and Education 12(2):13-16

Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 2, 66-70. Available at: http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V2/MB_V2_N3_Garland.pdf

Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to Analyze Likert and Other Rating Scale Data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 7(6):836-850.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001

Iwona, F. (2016). Application of the likert and osgood scales to quantify the qualitative features of real estate properties. Folia oeconomica stetinensia 7-16 DOI: 10.1515/foli-2016-002.

https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2016-0021

James, T.C. (2011). Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education 40(1),19-22

Johns, R. (2005) One size doesn't fit all: Selecting response scales for attitude items. Journal of Elections, Public, Opinion and Parties, 15(2), 237-264, doi:10.1080/136898805001788

https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880500178849

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S. and Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 7(4): 396-403.

https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 489-493. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.005

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.005

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5-55.

Purdey, B. (2013). Occupant stimulus response workplace productivity and the vexed question of a measurement. Workplace Productivity, 31(11), 505-520. doi:10.1108/F-03-2012-0021

https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2012-0021

Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., van Hoof, a., 't Hart, H., Verbogt, T. F. M. A., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2000). Adolescents' midpoint responses on Likert-type scale items: Neutral or missing values? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 208-216. doi:10.1093/ijpor/12.2.209

https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.2.209

Ryan, M. (1980). The Likert scale's midpoint in communications research. Journalism Quarterly, 57(2), 305-313.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700216

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680. doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677

Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R.C. I. and Mumu, J. (2022). Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research: Problems and Difficulties. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Winter 16 (4), 89-101 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7