Efficacy of Screencast Versus Textual Feedback on IELTS Writing Task 2
A Qualitative Study of Bangladeshi Test-Takers
Main Article Content
Abstract
It has been generally established that feedback serves an important purpose in developing second language learners’ writing skills. Screencast feedback is a new breed of feedback, whereas the most traditional mode of providing L2 writing feedback has been textual feedback. In the context of Bangladesh, research is scarce regarding screencast feedback in general, and IELTS writing feedback in particular. To fill that gap and compare screencast feedback with traditional textual feedback, this study adopts a qualitative approach by conducting an experiment on prospective and experienced Bangladeshi IELTS test-takers, and then interviewing them to gauge their attitudes toward the feedback modes. In a four-phase research framework, twenty-two participants wrote a pre- and post-feedback IELTS Writing Task 2 essay, with half receiving textual feedback and the rest receiving screencast feedback. Finally, semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore their perceptions. The essays were marked using the official IELTS Writing Task 2 rubric to ensure score validity and reliability. The experimental results revealed that both feedback modes, especially screencast feedback, led to significant score increases, particularly in the rubric elements of task response and coherence and cohesion. The perceptions of the Bangladeshi IELTS test-takers were remarkably positive for screencast feedback, to the point that all eleven screencast feedback receivers called for it to be introduced into curricula. To minimize teacher effort and boost efficiency, participants recommended that teachers provide screencast feedback to selected students and upload the videos anonymously so that other students can benefit from them.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhaiminul Islam Neon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Muhaiminul Islam Neon, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.
Muhaiminul Islam Neon is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in English with a concentration in Linguistics at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. He has published journal articles and presented at conferences on both English literature and English Language Teaching topics. He also writes fiction and has published poems, short stories, and, most proudly, a novel titled, Sociolinguistic Incompetence, which marries his love for linguistics and literature.
Al Amin, M., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The examination system in Bangladesh and its impact: On curriculum, students, teachers and society. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0060-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0060-9
Alharbi, M. A. (2022). Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students' text revisions in writing. Assessing Writing, 52, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100610
Ali, M. (2011). The study of errors and feedback in second language acquisition (SLA) research: Strategies used by the ELT practitioners in Bangladesh to address the errors their students make in learning English. IIUC Studies, 8, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v8i0.20409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v8i0.20409
Al-khazraji, A. (2019). Analysis of discourse markers in essays writing in ESL classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12235a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12235a
Awal, A. (2022). English and sustainable languages: Collective consciousness in Bangladesh. Polish Journal of English Studies, 8(1), 123–153. https://pjes.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PJES_8-1_8_Awal.pdf
Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44712
British Council. (n.d.). What is IELTS? https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/take-ielts/what-ielts
Brummer, L., de Boer, H., Mouw, J. M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2024). A meta-analysis of the effects of context, content, and task factors of digitally delivered instructional feedback on learning performance. Learning Environments Research, 27(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-024-09501-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-024-09501-4
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X
Din Eak, A., & Annamalai, N. (2024). Enhancing online learning: A systematic literature review exploring the impact of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-08-2023-0100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-08-2023-0100
Din Eak, A., & Annamalai, N. (2025). Enhancing ESL learners’ narrative writing proficiency: The role of multimodal online feedback. Language Teaching Research, 13621688251374430. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251374430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251374430
Edwards, K., Dujardin, A. F., & Williams, N. (2012). Screencast feedback for essays on a distance learning MA in professional communication. Journal of Academic Writing, 2(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.62
Ekşi, G. Y. (2012). Peer review versus teacher feedback in process writing: How effective? International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 13(1), 33–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321905974
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
Farrah, M. (2012). The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron University students. An-Najah University Journal of Research - B (Humanities), 26(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-026-001-008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-026-001-008
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Responding to writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 119–140). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810.010
Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.003
Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173290
Ferris, D. R., & Helt, M. (2000, March). Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. Tesol Quarterly, 24(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587229
Grami, M. (2005). The effect of teachers’ written feedback on ESL students’ perception: A study in a Saudi ESL university-level context. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 2(1), 1–12. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/arecls/archive/volume22005
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.003
IELTS. (2025). Test statistics. https://ielts.org/researchers/our-research/test-statistics
IELTS. (n.d.-a). IELTS Academic format: Writing. https://ielts.org/take-a-test/test-types/ielts-academic-test/ielts-academic-format-writing
IELTS. (n.d.-b). Test types. https://www.ielts.org/about-ielts/ielts-test-types
Islam, M. S., & Stapa, M. B. (2021). Students’ low proficiency in spoken English in private universities in Bangladesh: reasons and remedies. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0
Janopoulos, M. (1992). University faculty tolerance of NS and NNS writing errors: A comparison. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90011-D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90011-D
Kabir, S. A. (2018). IELTS writing test: Improving cardinal test criteria for the Bangladeshi context. Journal of NELTA, 23(1–2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v23i1-2.23352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v23i1-2.23352
Kahyalar, E., & Yılmaz, F. (2016). Teachers’ corrective feedback in writing classes: The impact of collaborating with a peer during the editing process on students’ uptake and retention. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 16(1), 148–160. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1100395
Kamberi, L. (2013). The significance of teacher feedback in EFL writing for tertiary level foreign language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1686–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.241
Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/328724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x
Kulhavy, R. W., & Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed instruction: Historical context and implications for practice. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 3–20). Educational Technology Publications.
Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
Li, W., Chen, X., & Huang, L. (2024). Promoting second language writing through technology-driven multimodal text feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(5), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2315104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2315104
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
Marsovna, B. L., Sergeevna, L. Y., & Vladimirovna, C. A. (2024). Screencasts for effective teacher feedback: A multimedia approach. Проблемы современного педагогического образования, (85-1), 62–65. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/screencasts-for-effective-teacher-feedback-a-multimedia-approach
Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 183–204). Ablex Publishing.
Mohiuddin, M., & Sultana, A. (2016). Preferences and problems in feedback techniques of Bangladeshi tertiary level students. Crossings: A Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.59817/cjes.v7i.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59817/cjes.v7i.174
Norouzian, R., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2012). Written error feedback from perception to practice: A feedback on feedback. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.11-22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.11-22
Parkes, M., & Fletcher, P. (2019, October). Let’s talk assessment: An exploration of student perceptions of audio feedback for assessment. In International Journal on E-Learning (pp. 441–460). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://doi.org/10.70725/421489qrocbb DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/421489qrocbb
Pearson, W. S. (2022). The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 52, 100611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100611
Penn, S., & Brown, N. (2022). Is screencast feedback better than text feedback for student learning in higher education? A systematic review. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 15(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v15i02/1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v15i02/1-18
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90078-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90078-4
Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. S., Karim, A., Chowdhury, T. A., Rahman, M. M., Seraj, P. M. I., & Singh, M. K. M. (2019). English language teaching in Bangladesh today: Issues, outcomes and implications. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0085-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0085-8
Ravand, H., & Rasekh, A. E. (2011). Feedback in ESL writing: Toward an interactional approach. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1136-1145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1136-1145
Rennie, C. E. (2000). Student preferences regarding grammar instruction and feedback in university level ESL courses [Master’s thesis, California State University, Sacramento].
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390
Ruegg, R. (2016). The effect of assessment of process after receiving teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.998168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.998168
Sayma, R. A. (2020). Fostering non-English major undergraduate students’ writing skill: A study in Cumilla region of Bangladesh. ASA University Review, 6(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLLL/69-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7176/JLLL/69-06
Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107
Solhi, M., & Eğinli, İ. (2020). The effect of recorded oral feedback on EFL learners' writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712628
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
van Nooijen, C. C., de Koning, B. B., Bramer, W. M., Isahakyan, A., Asoodar, M., Kok, E., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2024). A cognitive load theory approach to understanding expert scaffolding of visual problem-solving tasks: A scoping review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09848-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09848-3
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.416
Xie, X., Che, L., & Huang, H. (2022). Exploring the effects of screencast feedback on writing performance and perception of Chinese secondary school students. Research and Advances in Education, 1(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.12.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.12.01
Zaman, M. M., Azad, M., & Kalam, A. (2012). Feedback in EFL writing at tertiary level: teachers’ and learners’ perceptions. ASA University Review, 6(1), 139–156. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374166114_Feedback_in_EFL_Writing_at_Tertiary_Level_Teachers'_and_Learners'_Perceptions
Article Sidebar
